Forum post and description: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/council-motion-18-tinlake-lp-rewards-restructuring-july-2022/4400

The Tinlake rewards were miscalculated in Council Motion 18, so even though Council Motion 18 + 19 + Referendum 7 passed, the Council has proposed a new motion (Council Motion 20) with the correct values.

Schedule a majority-carries referendum to be tabled next once it is legal to schedule
an external referendum.

The dispatch of this call must be `ExternalMajorityOrigin`.

- `proposal_hash`: The preimage hash of the proposal.

Unlike `external_propose`, blacklisting has no effect on this and it may replace a
pre-scheduled `external_propose` call.

Weight: `O(1)`

Send a batch of dispatch calls.

May be called from any origin.

- `calls`: The calls to be dispatched from the same origin. The number of call must not
  exceed the constant: `batched_calls_limit` (available in constant metadata).

If origin is root then call are dispatch without checking origin filter. (This includes
bypassing `frame_system::Config::BaseCallFilter`).

# <weight>
- Complexity: O(C) where C is the number of calls to be batched.
# </weight>

This will return `Ok` in all circumstances. To determine the success of the batch, an
event is deposited. If a call failed and the batch was interrupted, then the
`BatchInterrupted` event is deposited, along with the number of successful calls made
and the error of the failed call. If all were successful, then the `BatchCompleted`
event is deposited.

- The Tinlake rewards were calculated incorrectly in Council Motion 18.
- The Council has proposed a new motion (Council Motion 20) with the correct values.
- Council Motion 18 + 19 + Referendum 7 passed.
- The new motion aims to fix the miscalculations.
- The details can be found in the provided link.

#18 Tinlake LP Rewards Restructuring July 2022

No Active Proposals